and Canal, moonlight effect
; see letter 774, n. 10. Van Gogh was in fact mistaken: Weissenbruch did not die until 1903.
, F 506 / JH 1670
, F 508 / JH 1671
and F 507 / JH 1672
.
as Paul Gauguin and the provenance of F 508 / JH 1671
as Julien Tanguy. Assuming this is correct, F 508 / JH 1671
must have been the version in Bernard’s possession, because the other versions of the Berceuse were with Jo van Gogh-Bonger (F 504 / JH 1655
and F 507 / JH 1672
) and Roulin (F 505 / JH 1669
).
) and Sunflowers in a vase (F 458 / JH 1667
). See letter 745.
; the still life on the right is F 456 / JH 1561
. See Van Tilborgh and Hendriks 2001, p. 21 (n. 18). The idea of the triptychs had been on Van Gogh’s mind for some time; see letter 736, n. 12.
and F 508 / JH 1671
(see n. 4 above), there remain two possibilities for the Berceuse with the red frame: F 504 / JH 1655
and F 507 / JH 1672
. Of these, F 504, the first version of the series, is the most likely candidate, because it is signed and bears the inscription ‘La berceuse’. This is not true of F 507, which, moreover, remained unfinished. See Rathbone et al. 2013, pp. 119-38.
).
) and – assuming that ‘the furrows’ refers, as it did in letter 765, to two works – Ploughed field with a tree-trunk (‘The furrows’) (F 573 / JH 1618
).
).
.
), Lilacs (F 579 / JH 1692
), Trees with ivy in the garden of the asylum (F 609 / JH 1693
) and The garden of the asylum (F 734 / JH 1698
).
. It actually depicts a ‘great peacock moth’, also known as Saturnia pyri (Information provided by John Rawlins, an entomologist at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, PA).
) (see n. 26 above), these were probably Periwinkle (F 1614 / JH 2060
) and Tassel hyacinth (F 1612 / JH 2059
). Arums (F 1613 / JH 1703) presumably originated in the last week of May or early June; see cat. Amsterdam 2007, pp. 191-200, cat. nos. 354-356.
) had to be lined because it had been damaged by moisture as the result of a flood; see letter 765. Theo had received it in the third consignment of paintings from Arles (letter 767). Eventually, at his brother’s request, Theo did not have it lined but sent it back to Vincent, who painted a repetition of it in September. See letters 779 and 800.
, c. 1877, was also in his possession; see letter 624, n. 6. A letter written by Gauguin to Pissarro in the summer of 1883 reveals that he had two paintings by Cézanne lined by Latouche at 34 rue Lafayette. See Correspondance Gauguin 1984, pp. 50-51, 386 (n. 115). Regarding Latouche, see letter 630, n. 10.