2. Meijer Isaac de Haan,
Uriel Acosta (present whereabouts unknown) shows the seventeenth-century Portuguese religious philosopher Uriël da Costa, who was exiled from the Jewish community by the Board of Rabbis in Amsterdam. The work was shown in the summer of 1888 in the Panorama Building at Plantage Prinsenlaan in Amsterdam, at an exhibition of works by De Haan and his pupils
Louis Jacob Hartz and
Joseph Jacob Isaäcson. The drawing after the work – which is what Theo must mean here – was published in J. Zürcher,
Meijer de Haan’s Uriël Acosta. Amsterdam 1888.
Ill. 916 . I.N. Stemming (pseudonym of the painter Johann Eduard Karsen) had criticized the painting as a poor imitation of Rembrandt, unworthy to be called a ‘work of art’. See ‘Meijer de Haan’s Uriel Acosta’,
De Nieuwe Gids 3, 1 July 1888, part two, pp. 435-437 (with epilogue on 15 July). Theo read
De Nieuwe Gids at this time (FR b916).
J.A. Alberdingk Thijm’s opinion was less harsh. He thought that the ‘design of the painting, the colour, the costumes’ were reminiscent of
Rembrandt, but that the execution was too dark and rather slapdash. See
Weekblad De Amsterdammer, 15 July 1888, p. 3. Cf. also
letter 707, n. 2.