7. Van Gogh is referring here to what
Jules and Edmond de Goncourt noted in their
Journal on 12 September 1868: ‘After buying this house for almost a hundred thousand francs, which bourgeois logic would view as totally unreasonable given our limited funds, we offer two thousand francs, which is more than the Emperor or de Rothschild would pay for a passing fancy, for a Japanese monstrosity, a fascinating bronze, which something told us we just had to have’. (Après l’achat de cette maison de près de cent mille francs, cette maison si déraisonnable au point de vue de la raison bourgeoise devant notre petite fortune, nous offrons deux mille francs, un prix dépassant le prix d’un caprice de l’Empereur ou de Rothschild, pour un monstre japonais, un bronze fascinatoire, que je ne sais quoi nous dit que nous devons posséder.) See Goncourt 1887-1906, vol. 3, p. 234. In the months of August and September 1868 they are full of their house, and write more than once about how expensive it is; cf. e.g. 4 August 1868 and 16 April 1869 (pp. 223, 289).
In
La maison d’un artiste (1881) Edmond de Goncourt gave a detailed description of his house at 53 boulevard Montmorency. All the works of art in it are listed as if it were a museum guide. The descriptions serve in part to rehabilitate eighteenth-century art and the artistic treasures of French culture. See
La maison d’un artiste. With a postscript by Pol Neveux. 2 vols. Paris n.d.
Various authors have regarded this passage as an allusion to
La maison d’un artiste, see Van Uitert 1993, pp. 139-140 and Dorn 1990, pp. 40, 233 (n. 36), however nowhere is there an explicit indication that Van Gogh had read this book; in
letter 677 he did, though, refer to ‘une maison d’un artiste’ (an artist’s house). Cf. also
letter 681, n. 6.