3. As a result of this petition,
Joseph d’Ornano, chief of police of the city of Arles, drew up a report on 27 February 1889 containing the neighbours’ statements. They reproached Van Gogh for over-indulging in drink, ‘after which he is in a state of over-excitement such that he no longer knows what he is doing or what he is saying’ (se livre à des excès de boissons après lesquels il se trouve dans un état de surexcitation tel qu’il ne sait plus, ni ce qu’il fait, ni ce qu’il dit). In the report, he was accused of indecent behaviour: ‘The women, especially, no longer feel comfortable, because he is prone to interfering with them, and makes obscene remarks in their presence’ (Les femmes surtout ne sont plus rassurées car il se livre sur elles à des attouchements et tient des propos obscènes en leur présence).
Ornano’s conclusion reads as follows: ‘Mr Vincent van Gogh is truly suffering from mental disturbance; however, we have noted on several occasions that this madman has moments of lucidity. Van Gogh is not yet a threat to public safety, but there are fears that he may become so. All his neighbours are frightened, and with good cause, because a few weeks ago, the madman concerned cut off an ear in a fit of insanity, a crisis that could be repeated and be harmful to somebody in his vicinity.’ (Le Mr Vincent Van Goghe est réellement atteint d’aliénation mentale; cependant nous avons constaté à différentes reprises que cet aliéné a des moments de lucidité. Van Goghe n’est pas encore dangereux pour la sécurité publique, mais on craint qu’il ne le devienne. Tous ses voisins sont effrayés, et cela à juste titre, car il y a quelques semaines l’aliéné dont il s’agit s’est coupé une oreille dans un accès de folie; crise qui pourrait se produire à nouveau et être funeste à quelque personne de son voisinage.)
See Documentation, 27 February 1889 and
Ill. 2280 ![- Report by the chief of police, Joseph d’Ornano (Click to view image) [2280]](/vg/interface/artworkref.png)
.
On the basis of this report, the petition and the statement made by
Dr Delon on 7 February (
see letter 747, n. 1), the
mayor gave orders for Van Gogh to be confined in hospital. On 26 February
Salles had informed Theo of Vincent’s admission to hospital; in his letter of 2 March he went into the contents of the report (FR b1047 and FR b1049).
The Arles municipal archives contains a copy of the letter in which the mayor gave orders to have Van Gogh, who ‘engages in acts unambiguously indicating mental disturbance’ (se livre à des actes non équivoque d’aliénation mentale), confined in hospital ‘to there be given the care his condition demands (pour y recevoir les soins qui réclame son état). It was also at this time that a letter was drafted in the mayor’s name, ordering Van Gogh’s transfer to the institution at Aix: ‘In view of the fact that it emerges from these various documents [the report, among others] that the mental state of the said insane person, far from improving, is deteriorating by the day, and that this unfortunate man is engaging in acts of raving madness that endanger his life and those of the people around him ... The individual Vincent van Gogh ... currently detained in the hospital at Arles, will immediately be taken to Aix to be placed in that city’s lunatic asylum, until such time as the prefect has pronounced on his indefinite admission to that establishment.’ (Considérant qu’il résulte de ces divers documents que l’état mental du dit aliéné loin de s’améliorer s’aggrave de jour en jour et que ce malheureux se livre à des actes de folies furieuses qui compromettent son existence et celle des personnes qui l’entourent ... Le nommé Vincent Van Gogh ... actuellement sequestré à l’hospice d’Arles, sera conduit immédiatement à Aix pour y être déposé dans l’asile d’aliénés de cette ville en attendant que M. le Préfet ait prononcé son admission définitive dans cet établissement.) (ACA). This decision was never taken.
![- Report by the chief of police, Joseph d’Ornano [2280]](/vg/illustrations/2280t.jpg)
4. After his first attack on 23 December 1888, during which he cut off part of his left ear (
see letter 728, n. 1), Van Gogh remained in hospital until 7 January 1889. Less than a month later he suffered a renewed attack, which led to his hospitalization on 7 February (
letter 747, n. 1). On the 17th or 18th he was allowed to leave the institution during the day, though he continued to eat and sleep at the hospital (
see letters 757 and
748). A third attack followed on 26 February. In a later letter to
Willemien, Vincent wrote that he had had four serious attacks of his illness (
see letter 764).
7. The petition (
n. 3 above) stated that Van Gogh overindulged in drink.
Salles asked himself, however, how reliable the testimony was, when he wrote to Theo on 2 March 1889: ‘They say ... he drinks heavily (the proprietor of the café, his neighbour, who had told me precisely the opposite, has confirmed that)’ (On dit ... qu’il boit beaucoup (le cafetier, son voisin, qui m’avait dit exactement le contraire, a affirmé cela)) (FR b1051).
Not only did Vincent’s neighbours have objections, but the medical staff was of the opinion that Van Gogh’s problems had to do with excessive consumption of tobacco, alcohol and coffee;
see letters 752 and
760, and the statement made by
Dr Delon, quoted in
letter 747, n. 1.
11. Theo travelled on 30 March to the Netherlands for his marriage to
Jo on 18 April in Amsterdam. Immediately afterwards, they left for Brussels, where they spent their one-day honeymoon, returning on Saturday, 20 April to Paris. See
Brief happiness 1999, pp. 27, 240 (n. 1) and
letter 762.